<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood?</title>
        <link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/topic/2616/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I built a USCG alder jazzmaster w/ a maple neck/ pau ferro board (humbucker bridge - p90 neck pup).  Love it.  In fact I'm so in love that I'm probably going to build another one just like it, but I want it to have a slightly different character - a darker character, something that might have a bit more mid range chug for rocking/punk rock sounds (I basically play progressive/alternative rock through a marshall JMC 800 - with a dark british voiced open back cabinet).My current jazzmaster is... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:12:21 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:56:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/49292/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-49292</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What Rusty said! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nocaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/49292</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:56:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/49287/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-49287</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Maybe we should aproach this question from a purely cause and effect approach.  These are things I know -  thicker/stiffer necks necks give a clearer and more
articulate tone than skinnies which tend to flex when played hard and therefore introduce discordanant string responses and a woolly bottom end (especially in
high gain playing) as the strings go out of tune and then back into tune when they are hit hard.   Maple is stiffer than mahogany and I guess most will agree
that maple sounds... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Russell)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/49287</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:56:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/49269/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-49269</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Substituting different necks, especially large section necks, produces more results than anything I can do with the batch of  12 different USACG bodies I have.
The board type probably has a role, but as often as not a maple cap neck and a indian rosewood cap will sound essentially the same, to me. When you got a guy
like Tommy choosing the blanks, the likelihood of marginal performance is so low, and frankly it is duds and meh bodies and meh necks these other guys
sometimes make that we can... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Boris Bubbanov)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/49269</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 06:55:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9918/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9918</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ DOn't forget the role pickups play in this.  Higher output Fralins or Suhrs will give a darker sound. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dale W Johnson)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9918</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9917/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9917</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ &gt;&quot;Surely then, the thicker neck reduces the vibration, and the greater wood mass increases the depth of the tone? To my way of thinking, this tends to add weight to my theory, so I guess it's a matter of perspective.&quot;<br><br>Well, the important thing is not the mass of the parts, but their resilience. An analogy that comes to mind is the DC resistance of pickups, which doesn't tell much about the tone transfer characteristics. Similarly, mass alone isn't the important factor -... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PeteMK1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9917</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 11:28:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9916/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9916</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Good points. Defining what we mean by tone is very difficult, as there are so many aspects to it, and then there are several subjectivities as to how we hear each of these.<br><br>What I do know is that it's not by chance that mahogany and swamp ash are popular for solid body instruments. They are default choices for their &quot;magical&quot;/dynamic qualities.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>&gt; &quot;I think a lot of the Strat and LP frequency response is in the neck... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nocaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9916</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 04:26:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9915/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9915</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ My take is that the effect of the body wood is principally a transient response thing.  That is, it's not so audible for a sustained note, but it makes a difference in the pick attack and overall feel of the guitar.<br><br>Resonance in solidbody instruments actually has a subtractive effect on string energy unless that energy is fed back into the strings.  Thankfully, there is feedback most of the time with woods like mahogany.  This gives a singing quality to the notes but compresses the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bfurman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9915</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 04:09:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9914/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9914</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>&gt; &quot;Neck - kept the same woods (maple/pau ferro), but went with 25&quot; scale instead of standard 25.5&quot;.&quot;</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Effect: slightly darker, slightly less snap, slightly less tension. (A little more Gibsonesque.)<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>&gt; 'Also went slightly thicker at .87&quot; instead of .85&quot;.'</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>&gt; &quot;Changed headstock from US-1... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nocaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9914</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 02:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9913/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9913</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>&gt; &quot;The long and narrow shape of the neck leads to significant vibration, which in turn alters the tone that's transmitted by the pickups. And, it is also well-known that changing from a skinny neck to a thicker one can dramatically change (and often improve) the sound of a guitar.&quot;</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Surely then, the thicker neck reduces the vibration, and the greater wood mass increases the depth of the tone? To my way of thinking,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nocaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9913</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 01:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9912/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9912</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Congrats, that sounds like a matched set of specs. The slightly more substantial neck, shorter scale, and the new body should deliver what you want.<br><br>I'm planning a Jazzymaster build myself, so I'm always interested in pics and tone reports. If I only could find more time for such projects...<div class='signature'><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Let the thunder roll and the lightning flash, I'm doing alright for country trash.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--></div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PeteMK1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9912</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9911/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9911</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ O.k. folks the order is in.  <br><br>Nocaster, your reference to approaching Gibsonesk territory rang true with me and scared me a bit.  So I went with the pau ferro board instead of rosewood - I would be seriously depressed if I ended up with a les paul sound after all the work required to finish and assemble one of these things (not the mention the G invested). <br><br>To summarize here is a comparison between my current guitar (silver Jazzmaster) and the one I'm going to build (white... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (kidmag)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9911</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9910/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9910</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ &gt;&quot;...then why is so much of a guitar's tone governed by the wood, size and shape of the guitar's body?&quot;<br><br>Well, that's exactly the question, how much of the tone actually is governed by it.<br><br>The top woods and the other factors definitely play a role, and I'm also able to hear some differences, but I have the impression that the neck is often a bit misunderestimated. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :P --><img... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PeteMK1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9910</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9909/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9909</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think we're talking at cross purposes, but I'm afraid I haven't got the time right now to get into an in-depth discussion.<br><br>BUT, maybe I can leave you with something for consideration, without getting into the science and why I think we're talking at cross purposes?<br><br>If the body wood plays such a relatively minor role, then why is so much of a guitar's tone governed by the wood, size and shape of the guitar's body? Why does the number of pieces matter? Why does a top wood alter... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nocaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9909</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 01:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9908/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A maple neck imparts snappy transients, as does the 25.5&quot; scale.  It's not as resonant as mahogany, but it will add some crispness to the instrument.  Mahogany is my favorite overall tone wood, but it can lose focus if overused.  Another solution is to use an ebony fingerboard over a mahogany neck.<br><br>My overall thinking is similar to Pete's.  I might add that guitar strings communicating through a tremolo only interact with body resonance in the most indirect way....<br><br>-Ben ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bfurman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9908</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 03:29:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9907/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9907</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the input everyone.  Seems like there really isn't an answer, only that everything is nuanced (as usual with guitar tone!!!).   Hmm, I'll probably go with a mahogony body and a maple neck with a rosewood board.   Fingers crossed that the mahog body adds a bit to the low end and mids, and the rosewood board rolls the highs down a bit, while the maple neck keeps it brighter and more articulate than a mahog/mahog (gibson) formula.  I also think maybe the 25.5 scale also helps with the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (kidmag)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9907</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 16:16:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9906/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9906</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ &gt;&quot;Some measurement results I have seen indicate that the neck plays a more important role.&quot;<br><br>I don't want to judge right or wrong regarding this question, nor do I intend to start a big discussion on it, but I'd like to give some reasons for my above statement and  explain the type of measurements I've seen. The weighting of this information is then up to the reader.<br><br>The starting point is the fact that the vibrational characteristics of a guitar determine the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PeteMK1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9906</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:19:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9905/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9905</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think the general consensus outside this forum is that the body wood makes a significantly greater contribution to the tone than does the neck wood. That's certainly the way I factor things, which to my knowledge, is a formula that has yet to fail.<br><br>Without totally reformulating the body and neck woods combinations, I'd suggest retaining that same neck formula, and for the body, substituting mahogany for the alder.<div class='signature'><!--EZCODE HR START--><hr /><!--EZCODE HR... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nocaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9905</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 05:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9904/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9904</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Some measurement results I have seen indicate that the neck plays a more important role. A mahogany neck should deliver what you want, AFAICS.<div class='signature'><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Let the thunder roll and the lightning flash, I'm doing alright for country trash.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--></div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PeteMK1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9904</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 08:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9903/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9903</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I'd say it's about 50:50, particularly if you include the effect of the fingerboard wood.<br><br>Anectodal experience:  swamp ash makes a surprisingly nice combination with a mahogany neck.  Very articulate, but darker than a Strat.<br><br>-Ben ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bfurman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9903</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/reply/9902/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html#reply-9902</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Splitting hairs.<br><br>I believe that the far larger chunk of body wood makes a larger difference. <br><br>Consider a mahogany body, or maybe even black limba/korina (if you want a transparent finish). ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wyattoons)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/sreply/9902</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Tone primarily dictated by neck or body wood? ]]></title>
			<link>http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/topic/2616/t/Tone-primarily-dictated-by-neck-or-body-wood-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I built a USCG alder jazzmaster w/ a maple neck/ pau ferro board (humbucker bridge - p90 neck pup).  Love it.  In fact I'm so in love that I'm probably going to build another one just like it, but I want it to have a slightly different character - a darker character, something that might have a bit more mid range chug for rocking/punk rock sounds (I basically play progressive/alternative rock through a marshall JMC 800 - with a dark british voiced open back cabinet).<br><br>My current... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (kidmag)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://guitarsbyfender.yuku.com/topic/2616</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:12:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>