I'm very interested in the L45s, or a combination of 200/290/298. I want something with some beef to offset the maple in a nice way - yet with as much deep, steely Fender twang as possible.
What do you think?
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
odd |
Which set of Bill's singlecoil-format pickups for my strat? |
Lead | ||
|
Alder body, maple neck. Play mostly funk and blues/fusion type stuff with it, but the guitar's my go to for anything Fender-like. Currently have a set of
very authentic vintage-type singlecoils in it, but the noise/hum here at home is simply too much.
I'm very interested in the L45s, or a combination of 200/290/298. I want something with some beef to offset the maple in a nice way - yet with as much deep, steely Fender twang as possible. What do you think?
Last Edited By: odd Tue, Jun 16, 2009 17:09:43.
Edited 2 times.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Bigue |
#1 | |||
|
I haven't tried the L45, so keep that in mind. For vintage Strat, I don't think you can beat the 200s, they're very close. 290 is available in
bridge only- great if you want a hotter bridge, but I personally prefer the 200 for more of the vintage sound, a bit twangier. 280s are great too, but they
are more even across the frequencies. Would also be a good choice. But again, I think the 200s are the "stratiest" of the bunch.
|
||||
|
|
||||
gonzo |
#2 | |||
|
i prefer the 280's
i think they have more diversity if you just gotta quack, for for the 200's i think the l45, from what i've read, would be going in the opposite direction |
||||
|
|
||||
fuzzy beard |
#3 | |||
|
IMHO, the L-45 is Bills best single coil sized model. It's just as versatile as the 280 and mixed position quack is superb. Overdrive sounds are
brilliant, too.
|
||||
|
|
||||
handsplayingbutterfly |
#4 | |||
|
I agree with Fuzzy. The L-45 is my recommendation as well.
|
||||
|
|
||||
gmcase9 |
#5 | |||
|
My strat is lacking a little clarity in the neck position. I have fender texas special there now. I was thinking of getting the L-45s. I'd really like to
keep it in the single coil size, but it would be nick to get halfway decent jazz tone too. Can the L45s achieve this? Any recomendations?
|
||||
|
|
||||
fuzzy beard |
#6 | |||
|
Listen to Bills playing at youtube.
L-45s are very versatile. You can also add a push/pull pot to add the bridge pickup in series with the neck pickup when you need a slightly thicker sound. |
||||
|
|
||||
odd |
#7 | |||
|
Thanks everyone. One final question though: can the LS-45 *twang* on a maple neck? I mean, that fat kind of twang when you bend a third just right to major
somewhere around the seventh fret and the neck seems to vibrate just right with the body. If that makes any sense.
|
||||
|
|
||||
hopdybob |
#8 | |||
|
not to confuse you but maybe the keystone set would be a nice choice, almost everybody claim there silence although they are not noiseless
|
||||
|
|
||||
fuzzy beard |
#9 | |||
|
<Thanks everyone. One final question though: can the LS-45 *twang* on a maple neck? I mean, that fat kind of twang when
you bend a third just right to major somewhere around the seventh fret and the neck seems to vibrate just right with the body. If that makes any
sense.>
The L-45 will not be the limiting factor |
||||
|
|
||||
odd |
#10 | |||
fuzzy beard wrote: The L-45 will not be the limiting factor That's what I want to hear. It's just that I haven't got it from a dual-coil pup yet. |
||||
|
|
||||
gmcase9 |
#11 | |||
|
also, the metal plate around the pu on a tele is a big part of the twang
|
||||
|
|
||||